Useomia vs Otterly: Which AI Visibility Tool Wins in 2026?
Useomia (Omnia at useomnia.com) against Otterly.AI: engines, refresh speed, prompt caps, pricing, and the layer neither one publishes.
Two monitors, two different philosophies. Omnia (searched as Useomia, hosted at useomnia.com) tracks daily and adds an agent. Otterly.AI is the cheap, fast on-ramp that refreshes less often. Here is how they line up, and what neither of them covers.
Pricing side by side
Omnia bills in euros. Growth is 79 euros a month for up to 25 prompts and 150 insight credits. Pro is 279 euros for up to 100 prompts and 600 credits. Enterprise is 499 euros for 200+ prompts and 1,500 credits, with a dedicated manager. Yearly billing takes 20 percent off, and credit packs cost 10, 50, or 100 euros.
Otterly bills in dollars. Lite is $29 a month ($25 annual) for 15 prompts. Standard is $189 ($160 annual) for 100 prompts, with API and Looker Studio export. Premium is $489 ($422 annual) for 400 prompts. Gemini, Claude, and Google AI Mode are add-ons from $9 to $149 a month depending on tier.
Put differently, Otterly is cheaper at the very bottom, but 15 prompts is a test allowance. At around 100 prompts the two are in the same neighborhood: 279 euros against $189. Currencies differ, so check today's exchange rate before you decide.
Engines and freshness
Omnia tracks ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, and Perplexity by default, with Claude, Gemini, and Copilot on request, up to seven. Its prompts run every 24 hours.
Otterly covers ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Copilot as base engines. Our listing notes that monitoring data can be up to seven days old, so treat it as a weekly view. If you are trying to catch a change the day after you publish, that matters.
What each does beyond tracking
Omnia's agent, Omnio, creates content, briefs, and outreach, and publishes to a CMS after you approve. That puts it a step ahead of Otterly on action. Omnia also stores the full answer text for each run.
Otterly offers a GEO audit that grades 25+ on-page factors, coverage across 65+ countries, unlimited seats, and a Semrush integration. It has no traffic attribution and no PDF export for client reporting.
A genuine no-card trial, versus a free checker
Otterly gives a trial of around 14 days without a credit card. Omnia offers a free visibility checker that runs 40 prompts across four engines and emails a report in a few minutes. They are different kinds of free, so use both if you are undecided.
Who should pick which
| Situation | Better pick |
|---|---|
| Smallest budget, just looking | Otterly.AI |
| Daily freshness | Omnia |
| Want drafts and briefs from the same login | Omnia |
| 65+ countries and Semrush integration | Otterly.AI |
| More than 100 prompts | Neither, see below |
The gap they share
Neither tool publishes an AI crawler-log product on the pages we reviewed. You cannot see ChatGPTBot or ClaudeBot hitting your pages, and you cannot link AI-referred sessions to conversions. That is the layer that decides whether a visibility program is worth funding next quarter.
Promptwatch fills it. Agent Analytics shows crawler activity and the crawl-to-citation path, visitor analytics attach conversions to AI referrals, and citation analytics go down to page, Reddit, and YouTube level. Content Agents then publish to Webflow or Framer. It starts with a free Explore plan (10 prompts, ChatGPT only), then $95 a month for Essential, which is far enough to test the crawler-log layer against your own domain.
Verdict
Pick Otterly if price is the only constraint and weekly data is fine. Pick Omnia if you want daily tracking with an agent that drafts the fix. If you need to show that the fix worked, evaluate Promptwatch first and treat the other two as monitors you can graduate from.