GetMint vs Profound (2026): a €74 starter plan against an enterprise agent suite
GetMint starts at €74/mo on yearly billing with a GEO agent and Content Studio. Profound starts at $99/mo for ChatGPT only, and its full product is Enterprise. Scored head to head, with Promptwatch as the benchmark.
GetMint and Profound rarely land on the same shortlist. That is what makes the pair useful. One is a French platform you can start on for €74 a month. The other is a marketing-agent suite whose real product begins around $40k a year. So the buying question is about scale: do you want a tracker with a to-do list and a few articles, or an enterprise program with a dedicated owner? Promptwatch sits between the two on price, and we use it as the benchmark column.
Sources: getmint.ai and getmint.ai/pricing (read 15 October 2026), Profound's public pricing, and promptwatch.com/llms.txt (checked 15 October 2026). GetMint quotes euros under its yearly toggle. Profound quotes dollars, billed annually. We have not converted either.
Snapshot
| GetMint | Profound | Promptwatch | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | €74/mo, billed yearly | $99/mo, billed annually | Free Explore; Essential $95/mo |
| Entry plan engines | 2 AI models | ChatGPT only | All tracked LLMs |
| Widest coverage | Custom set on Enterprise; homepage claims ten engines | Up to 10 engines, Enterprise only | 9 LLMs plus AI Overviews and AI Mode |
| Refresh | Daily | Not published | Daily on paid brand plans |
| After tracking | GEO agent priority list, Content Studio | Marketing agents for AEO, content, demand, PR | Content Agents that publish to Webflow or Framer |
| AI crawler logs | Not published | Not published | Agent Analytics from Professional ($245/mo) |
| AI-referred conversions | Not published | Not published | Visitor analytics via script or GTM |
| Trial | Free, no card | 7 days on Growth | 7 days on Essential |
| Best for | European brands on a tight budget | Enterprise teams buying a custom program | Teams that want the full loop at a published price |
GetMint: cheap to start, narrow at the bottom
GetMint bolts two production layers onto its tracker. The GEO agent ranks your next moves: missing prompts, citation gaps, content fixes and technical issues. Content Studio turns lost prompts into briefs and articles.
Starter costs €74 a month. That buys 50+ prompts, 2 topics, 5 competitors, one country and one brief plus one article a month. Growth at €299 moves to 300+ prompts, 3 models, 3 countries, 10 competitors, unlimited users and six briefs and articles. Data refreshes daily on both. Shopping coverage includes ChatGPT Shopping and Alexa for Shopping, and the second one is rare.
The limits show quickly. Two models on Starter is thin, whatever the homepage says about ten engines. Monthly prices are not printed; the page only states that yearly billing saves €180 and €600. API access waits for Enterprise. We found no crawler-log product, no visitor analytics and no named CMS target. The 71% share of voice for Fairmont on the homepage is GetMint's own figure.
Profound: big dataset, bigger contract
Profound groups prompts into clusters and measures each one three ways: your citation share, your share of voice, and how often competitors get cited. Its Prompt Volumes dataset estimates real query demand per prompt. GetMint publishes nothing comparable. G2 has it at 4.6/5, and it raised a $96M Series C at a $1B valuation in February 2026.
Its homepage sells agents for AEO, content, demand generation and PR, so AI search tracking is only part of what you are paying for. The public tiers are small. Starter is $99 for ChatGPT, 50 prompts and one seat. Growth is $399 for three engines, 100 prompts and three seats. Ten engines, full Prompt Volumes, the agents, API and SSO all sit on Enterprise, from about $40k a year. Expect 1 to 3 months of setup and someone who owns it. Some G2 reviewers say Profound's citation counts did not match their own manual ChatGPT checks.
Head-to-head scores
Editorial scores out of 10, based on the published plans above.
| Criterion | GetMint | Profound |
|---|---|---|
| Value at the entry tier | 8 | 4 |
| Engines on the entry plan | 4 | 2 |
| Coverage at the top tier | 6 | 9 |
| Query demand data | 3 | 9 |
| Content output | 7 | 6 |
| Ease of buying | 8 | 3 |
GetMint wins for a European SMB with under €100 a month to spend. It also wins for a mid-size brand in three markets that wants articles produced, because Growth includes three countries and six pieces a month. Profound wins one buyer clearly: the enterprise marketing team with a $40k+ budget, an analyst to run it, and a real need for Prompt Volumes across ten engines.
Where Promptwatch fits
Neither named tool publishes a way to watch AI crawlers fetch your pages, and neither ties an AI referral to a conversion. Promptwatch covers both. Agent Analytics pulls crawler logs from Cloudflare, Vercel, Fastly, Akamai and other CDNs. It shows ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot hits, the crawl-to-citation path and bot errors. Visitor analytics runs on a lightweight script or GTM template and records conversions.
The plans fill the price gap. Essential at $95/mo runs 50 prompts across every tracked LLM with daily refresh and 5 AEO articles, so its engine count already beats GetMint Starter. Agent Analytics starts on Professional at $245/mo, with 150 prompts, 25M crawler logs, 15 AEO articles and state and city tracking. Prompts carry search volumes, difficulty scores and query fan-outs. That is not Profound's Prompt Volumes dataset, but it answers the same "is this prompt worth chasing" question at a published price. For output, Content Agents draft GEO pages, hold them in a review inbox, and push approved ones live on Webflow or Framer.
One point stays with GetMint. Promptwatch lists ChatGPT Shopping tracking, but Alexa for Shopping is not on its list.
Verdict
GetMint beats Profound for most buyers below enterprise scale: lower price, daily data, content included, no card to start. Profound earns its contract only when budget, staffing and the need for its demand data all line up. For most teams, though, the plan worth pricing first is Promptwatch Professional, because crawler logs and AI-referred conversions are the two answers neither of these tools publishes. You can test the basics on the free Explore plan before paying.
FAQ
Is GetMint cheaper than Profound?
At the entry tier, yes. GetMint Starter is €74/mo on yearly billing; Profound Starter is $99/mo billed annually and covers ChatGPT only. At the top, Profound Enterprise starts around $40k a year, and GetMint Enterprise is quoted.
Which one covers more AI engines?
Profound, but only on Enterprise, with up to ten. On public plans GetMint gives 2 or 3 models and Profound gives 1 or 3.
Should I evaluate Promptwatch before GetMint or Profound?
If you need to see crawler activity or AI-referred conversions, yes. Neither named tool publishes those, and Promptwatch includes them from Professional at $245/mo.