Promptwatch vs HeyAmos vs RocketBlue vs Temso: 2026 Comparison
Four 'track then act' GEO tools compared: HeyAmos weekly checklists, RocketBlue content autopilot, Temso's closed loop, and Promptwatch's full platform.
A lot of 2026 GEO pitches now say they will not only track a prompt but also tell you what to write. HeyAmos, RocketBlue, and Temso all sell that verb. Promptwatch already ships it as Content Agents, with crawler logs and visitor analytics on the same bill.
The verb is the same but the center of gravity is not. "Track then act" can mean a weekly checklist that tells you what to write next, an autopilot that drafts and publishes for you, or a closed loop that ties the draft back to the crawl that produced it. The four products below each pick one of those meanings. The comparison is less about which one drafts better prose and more about what each draft is attached to.
Google's AI features pages remain the Overviews rulebook. Action queues do not replace Search Console. A tool that writes you a brief is still working off observed or modeled prompts, and the rules for what gets cited in an Overview come from Google, not from the vendor. Use the action layer to produce content. Use Search Console and the vendor's own logs to check whether the content got fetched and cited.
Four ways to "close the loop"
| Promptwatch | HeyAmos | RocketBlue | Temso | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sticker | Free; paid $95/mo | $99/mo | $199/mo | $89/mo |
| What that buys | Essential: 50 prompts, citations, visitors, 5 AEO articles. Claude included on paid | Starter: ChatGPT + AI Overviews, 25 prompts each, 10 actions, MCP. Weekly cadence | Growth: 100 prompts, 5 platforms, 300 action credits, MCP/API, 5 seats. No Claude, no AI Mode, no Copilot | Starter: 3 models, 50 prompts, 10K bot visits, 5 content pieces |
| When Claude shows up | Paid plans | Add-on, including on Pro ($399) | Custom plan only | Add-on at $5/mo per prompt, chunks of 25 |
| Action layer | Content Agents to Webflow/Framer | Five weekly actions. Agent Amos from Growth ($249) | Content queue is the product. Credits meter the work | Draft/publish in the stack; real bot-log volume is Growth ($199) |
Read the table by column, not by sticker. The sticker row is the number a homepage leads with. The "what that buys" row is what you actually get for that number, and it is where the four products diverge most. Promptwatch Essential at $95 covers 50 prompts, citations, visitors, and 5 AEO articles with Claude on the paid list. HeyAmos Starter at $99 covers ChatGPT and AI Overviews at a weekly cadence. RocketBlue Growth at $199 covers 100 prompts across five platforms but holds Claude, AI Mode, and Copilot for higher tiers. Temso Starter at $89 covers three models and 10K bot visits, which is a smaller slice than the homepage implies.
The "when Claude shows up" row is the one most buyers miss. Claude is a paid plan feature on Promptwatch, an add-on at every HeyAmos tier including Pro, a Custom-only feature on RocketBlue, and a per-prompt add-on on Temso. If the brief names Claude, the real card for three of these four products lands above the sticker.
Professional on Promptwatch is $245/mo (150 prompts, 15 AEO articles). Agency Kick-off is $199/mo, unlimited projects and prompts. Those two tiers are where the crawler logs and the higher limits live, and they are the ones to compare against RocketBlue Growth and Temso Growth rather than against the entry stickers.
HeyAmos: a weekly to-do list, two engines at $99
HeyAmos is honest about output: five actions, not another raw dashboard. Methodology is stated (each prompt run multiple times per model, weekly). Starter is ChatGPT plus Overviews. Gemini and Perplexity wait for Pro at $399/mo. Growth at $249 adds AI Mode, 5 content pieces, Agent Amos. Agency is $299/mo (250 prompts, ChatGPT/Gemini/Overviews, 10 pitch accounts). Claude, Copilot, and DeepSeek are add-ons on every listed self-serve plan.
The honesty about output is the selling point and the limit. Five actions a week is a concrete deliverable a marketing lead can put on a slide. It is also a small number of actions relative to a brand that runs across engines, and it is locked to a weekly cadence, which means a prompt that moves on a Tuesday does not get rechecked until the following week. Starter watches two surfaces. The other engines sit behind Pro and behind add-ons.
$99 buys a weekly ChatGPT/AIO checklist. The "full GEO playbook" on the homepage is $399 plus add-ons. Two engines at a weekly cadence is a proof of mentions, not a program that survives a Tuesday rewrite. If the brief names Gemini or Perplexity, the add-on math pushes the real card past the sticker before the second month. The buyer who picks HeyAmos should be picking it for the checklist format, not for the engine coverage at the sticker price.
RocketBlue: autopilot with five platforms, Claude later
RocketBlue Growth is $199/mo (20% off yearly): 100 prompts, five platforms, 300 action credits, MCP/API, GSC/GA4/Cloudflare/WordPress listed, 5 seats, 7-day trial. Pro is $499/mo: 300 prompts, adds AI Mode, 1,500 credits. Custom adds Copilot and Claude (8 platforms), strategist, Reddit/off-site, SSO.
The Growth tier is built around the content queue. The 300 action credits meter the work the autopilot does, which means a busy month of drafting and publishing can burn through the allowance before the month ends. The five platforms are a wider surface than HeyAmos Starter, but the three engines a lot of buyers ask about, Claude, AI Mode, and Copilot, are not on Growth. They sit on Custom, which is a conversation with sales rather than a sticker.
VPN-per-country tracking is more specific than a global average. Content work still burns action credits. Prompt-volume research, data export, and onboarding are not on Growth. If the brief needs Claude on invoice one, Growth is the wrong SKU. The buyer who picks RocketBlue should be picking it for the autopilot at $199, and should plan to either stay within Growth's limits or move to Custom rather than to Pro, since Pro adds AI Mode and credits but not Claude.
Temso: same slide as Promptwatch, thinner door
Temso Starter $89, Growth $199, Professional $499. Unlimited seats and projects. Starter's three models and 10K bot visits are not the "all models, 25M visits" homepage. See the Temso review for the Claude add-on math.
The homepage pitch and the Starter SKU describe different products. Unlimited seats and projects is a real differentiator for teams that want to hand logins out without negotiating. The tradeoff is that Starter's three models and 10K bot visits are a thin slice of what the homepage slide shows. A buyer who picks Temso on the homepage impression and buys Starter will have a smaller log than they expected. Growth at $199 is where the bot-log volume gets real, and it is the tier to compare against Promptwatch's $199 agency entry.
Promptwatch: act without dropping diagnosis
The reason this four-way still ranks Promptwatch first is not the existence of a draft button. HeyAmos, RocketBlue, and Temso all draft something. Promptwatch is the one that also keeps Agent Analytics (ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, and others), citation analytics (page, domain, Reddit, YouTube), and visitor conversions, with Claude on the paid list instead of a custom row. Explore remains free (10 ChatGPT prompts). G2 4.7/5, 1,840+ brands.
The distinction is what the draft is attached to. A content queue that is not wired to a crawler log and a traffic script can produce pages the bots never fetched and the model never cited. Promptwatch keeps the diagnosis and the publish on the same bill, so a lost prompt becomes a fetch ticket before it becomes a brief. The other three sell the brief first and treat the diagnosis as a separate purchase or a later tier.
That ordering is the practical point. If the diagnosis and the publish live in the same login, a content team can see that a prompt dropped, check whether the target page was crawled, check whether the crawl produced a citation, and check whether the citation produced a visitor, all before deciding what to write next. If those steps live in different products, the team either skips them or pays for a second tool to do them. Promptwatch's claim to the platform cell is that it does not make you choose.
Who should pick which
- HeyAmos if a weekly five-item list is the deliverable and two engines are enough.
- RocketBlue if you will spend $199+ on a content queue and can live without Claude until Custom.
- Temso if you want unlimited seats and will pay Growth, not Starter.
- Promptwatch if tracking, crawlers, traffic, and publish have to live in one login.
FAQ
Is HeyAmos cheaper than Promptwatch Essential?
$99 vs $95 is a wash on sticker. Essential includes a wider engine list, citation analytics, and visitor analytics. Crawler logs start on Professional at $245/mo or an agency plan. HeyAmos Starter is two engines, weekly. Price the engines, not the hero number. The four-dollar gap disappears the moment the brief names a third engine.
Does RocketBlue replace Content Agents?
It is a content autopilot with a tracker attached. Promptwatch is a tracker (plus crawlers and visits) with Content Agents attached. Same family of verb, different center of gravity. RocketBlue's credits meter the content work. Promptwatch's Content Agents sit on top of the diagnosis layer. Review: Promptwatch.
Can I skip crawler logs if the tool writes the article?
Only if you like rewriting pages the bot never fetched. Google's Overviews rules and a draft are not a fetch log. A draft tells you what to write. A crawler log tells you whether the page you wrote got fetched by the bot that would cite it. The two answer different questions, and the second one is what stops a content program from producing pages that never reach the model. Product: promptwatch.com.