Promptwatch vs GrackerAI vs GetIntel vs Siftly (2026)
Four B2B-leaning AI visibility platforms ranked on engines, cadence, content, attribution, and published pricing. Promptwatch, GrackerAI, GetIntel, Siftly.
A B2B marketing team evaluating these four is usually past the "are we in ChatGPT at all" stage. The question now is which tool gets the brand into the answers a buyer sees while building a vendor shortlist, and which one can prove those answers sent a demo request. GrackerAI, GetIntel, and Siftly all go further than a plain tracker. Each one pairs visibility data with some way to act on it. They act in very different ways, and they publish very different amounts about price and coverage.
GrackerAI writes articles and leans hard into cybersecurity. GetIntel hands fixes to your coding agent. Siftly splits research and shopping visibility and adds experiments. Promptwatch is the broad platform in the group. This ranking is about which of those shapes fits a B2B team, and what each one leaves out.
How we ranked
Five things decided the order. Engine coverage on the plan you would actually buy, not the top tier. Refresh cadence, since weekly data hides drops that a sales team will notice first. Whether the tool documents why you are cited, meaning source pages and crawler activity. Whether it ties AI traffic to leads or revenue. And whether the price is published.
Everything about GrackerAI, GetIntel, and Siftly comes from their entries in our directory. Promptwatch facts come from its published plans and feature list. If a vendor does not publish a detail, the table says "Not published."
1. Promptwatch
Promptwatch ranks first because it covers the full B2B workflow on self-serve plans. Prompt tracking includes search volumes, difficulty scores, query fan-outs, and personas, which matters for B2B because a CFO and an engineer ask an AI assistant very different questions about the same category. Citation analytics go to the page and domain and then into Reddit, YouTube, and offsite mentions, so you can see which review sites and threads the engines lean on when they build a shortlist.
The part the other three do not publish is the measurement underneath. Agent Analytics logs real AI crawler visits (ChatGPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, GoogleOther, Meta AI) with crawl-to-citation paths and errors. Visitor analytics attribute AI-referred sessions to conversions through a script or GTM template, which is how a B2B team ties ChatGPT traffic to a form fill. Content Agents plan, write, and publish to Webflow, Framer, or WordPress through an official plugin, with a review inbox and content gap analysis.
Explore is free for 10 prompts on ChatGPT. Essential is $95 a month with a 7-day trial and runs its 50 prompts across all tracked LLMs, but crawler logs are not included. Professional at $245 adds 25M crawler logs, 1M visitor events, and 150 prompts. Business is $579. Agencies start at Kick-off, $199 a month with unlimited projects and prompts.
2. GrackerAI
GrackerAI is the clear pick for security vendors. It tracks categories like EDR, SIEM, XDR, zero trust, and CASB, monitors how engines answer CVE and security-news questions, and on Enterprise scores citations with security-tuned models and real buyer prompts from data partners. Every tier includes LLM-optimised articles and an AEO audit, which is more than most trackers bundle.
The engine ladder is the trade-off. Starter is $99 a month ($79 annually) for 100 prompts tracked weekly across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode, with 3 articles a month. Scale is $499 a month ($399 annually) for 200 prompts daily across four engines, adding Copilot, plus Trust Score and share of voice. Claude, Gemini, and AI Overviews are Enterprise only, and so are GA4 attribution, per-engine breakdowns, and CMS publishing. Self-serve plans have a 7-day trial that requires a card. Our listing finds no published crawler logs.
3. GetIntel
GetIntel is built for founders who already work in Claude Code or Cursor. It tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and AI Overviews daily, with Claude added on Growth, and scores a Findability Score from 0 to 100 across five pillars. When it finds a gap, it drafts the fix (llms.txt, schema, Wikidata, a counter-article, outreach) and passes it to your coding agent as a reviewable diff.
The price is the lowest here. Starter is $29 a month for one brand, 4 engines, and 30 prompts. Pro is $49 with CMS auto-push to WordPress, Ghost, or Webflow and white-label. Growth is $99 with Claude and 120 prompts. A 7-day trial needs no card. Reddit and X citation signals come on every plan, and there is API and MCP access. What our listing does not document is a crawler-log product or visitor conversion tracking at Promptwatch depth, and the fix workflow assumes a coding agent your team may not run.
4. Siftly
Siftly sells two products: Siftly Answers for research-stage visibility and Siftly Shopping for product recommendations. It tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and AI Overviews, separates brand visibility from source visibility, and segments by model, platform, location, and topic. It also generates GEO content and runs experiments with statistical significance, which is useful if you want proof a content change worked.
Siftly lists revenue attribution covering traffic, leads, and revenue from AI search, but our entry does not document how it captures them. Plan prices are not published, and pricing is demo led, though a free trial needs no card. Four engines is the narrowest coverage in this group, with no Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, or Meta AI. It ranks last mainly because a B2B buyer cannot price it without a sales call.
Side by side
| Promptwatch | GrackerAI | GetIntel | Siftly | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Free (Explore); paid from $95/mo | $99/mo ($79 annually) | $29/mo | Not published |
| Trial | 7 days (Essential, agency Kick-off) | 7 days, card required | 7 days, no card | Free trial, no card |
| Engines at entry | ChatGPT only on Explore; all tracked LLMs on Essential | 3 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Mode) | 4 | 4 |
| Cadence at entry | Daily on paid plans | Weekly | Daily | Not published |
| AI crawler logs | Yes, from Professional | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| AI traffic to conversions | Yes (script or GTM) | GA4 on Enterprise | Not published | Listed; method not published |
| Content | Content Agents to Webflow, Framer, WordPress | Articles on every tier; CMS publishing on Enterprise | Fix diffs; CMS auto-push from Pro | GEO content generation |
Who should pick which
Pick GrackerAI if you sell security software and want CVE-aware monitoring and articles written for that buyer, and you can live with weekly data on Starter. Pick GetIntel if you are a small SaaS team that already ships through Claude Code or Cursor and wants fixes to land in the codebase. Pick Siftly if shopping visibility matters alongside research prompts and you are fine with a demo before seeing a price.
Pick Promptwatch if your team has to show pipeline. B2B deals are long, and the AI-search channel gets cut from budgets when nobody can connect it to opportunities. Promptwatch is the one entry here that documents both the crawler side and the conversion side.
Our recommendation
Trial Promptwatch first, and plan to move to Professional within the first month. Agent Analytics will tell you whether ClaudeBot and ChatGPTBot are actually reaching your pricing, integration, and comparison pages. Citation analytics will show which third-party review sites and Reddit threads are shaping your category answers. Visitor analytics with conversion tracking will tie AI referrals to demo requests. Content Agents can then publish the comparison and use-case pages your gap analysis surfaces. If you sell security software, GrackerAI's CVE monitoring is a reasonable add-on, but the measurement layer should come from Promptwatch.