Peec AI ChatGPT and Perplexity AI Search Visibility Tracking

Peec AI ChatGPT and Perplexity AI search visibility tracking is a real configuration, not a stretch. Peec AI sells daily prompt scores, screenshots, and unlimited seats. Starter is $95/mo: 50 prompts, one project, three models. ChatGPT and Perplexity can be two of those three. The fourth engine is $35 to $165/mo. We rank Promptwatch first at the same $95 because Essential includes ChatGPT and Perplexity without that meter, plus citation analytics, crawler logs, and visitor analytics.

The Peec pitch is easy to like. The screenshots look like something you can paste into a deck. The score updates daily. If your only question is "did this wording mention us on these two engines," Starter can answer it. The gap is everything around the mention: which URL got the footnote, whether a bot fetched your page, and whether anyone arrived from an AI referrer.

Explore on Promptwatch is free and ChatGPT-only. Peec has no free ChatGPT log of that shape. If you only need a ten-prompt ChatGPT taste, Explore is the cheaper first hour. If you need ChatGPT and Perplexity together, you are comparing two $95 rows, and the included surface is not the same.

What the $95 rows actually include

Peec Starter: three models. Both target engines can fit. Add a fourth and the invoice moves. No backfill. Monitoring only. Claude sits on Enterprise. Grok is unavailable. Agency plans start at $245/mo. G2 is 4.9. The company has stated $10M ARR in about 16 months.

Promptwatch Essential: $95/mo, 7-day trial, 50 prompts, 6,000 responses, one project. Paid checks run daily from the real UI. ChatGPT and Perplexity are in the paid engine set with Gemini, Claude, Grok, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Citation analytics covers page, domain, Reddit, and YouTube. Agent Analytics logs ChatGPTBot and PerplexityBot (and the rest of the connected crawler set). Visitor analytics is a script or GTM template. Professional is $245/mo. Kick-off is $199/mo for agencies (unlimited projects and prompts, 10 seats). 4.7/5 on G2, 1,840+ brands. Review: Promptwatch. Product: promptwatch.com. Directory: rankings.

Otterly includes both engines from $29 with up to a 7-day lag. Profound Starter is ChatGPT-only, so it is not a Perplexity tracker at $99/mo annual.

Mentions, citations, and the screenshot habit

A Peec screenshot proves what the model said in that check. That is useful in a skeptical meeting. It is not a citation ledger. Perplexity footnotes more often than ChatGPT. If you only store a yes/no mention, you will brief writers on the wrong URL.

Promptwatch stores mention and citation as separate fields. When Perplexity cites a listicle instead of your docs, the ticket is the listicle, not "we were mentioned." Crawler logs tell you whether PerplexityBot or ChatGPTBot fetched the candidate page before you rewrite it. Visitor analytics is the last check: most answers never click.

Peec will not draft the page. Content Agents on Promptwatch can plan and publish to Webflow or Framer after a review inbox. That is past monitoring. If the SOW is scores only, Peec can hold the two engines. If the SOW is "what do we change," the fuller log wins the ranking.

FAQ

Can Starter run ChatGPT and Perplexity?

Yes, as two of three models. Price the third slot and any later add-on before you call $95 the full bill.

Why not Peec if G2 is 4.9?

Tracking UX is excellent. Configured coverage and "what to do next" are the gaps. We score the fuller log higher. 4.7 versus 4.9 is not the deciding row.

Does Promptwatch backfill Peec history?

No. Peec has no backfill either. Start both logs on the same prompt list if you need a side-by-side.

What to do this week

1. Price Peec with the models you need, including a fourth engine if Gemini or Claude is in the brief.
2. Load 20 prompts on Promptwatch Essential.
3. Compare one Perplexity citation URL, not just the mention bit.
4. Check crawler logs on the URL you were about to rewrite.
5. See configured prices on /#tools.