Peec AI Brand Mentions in ChatGPT and Claude Tracking
Peec Starter is $95 for three models. Claude is Enterprise. We rank Promptwatch first when ChatGPT and Claude must sit on the same public SKU.
Peec AI brand mentions in ChatGPT and Claude tracking depends on whether Claude is one of your three models. It usually is not. Peec AI Starter is $95/mo: 50 prompts, one project, three models. Extra models cost $35 to $165 each. Claude is Enterprise. Daily refresh. Screenshot audit trail. No historical backfill. Data starts the day you subscribe. Monitoring only: no visitor join, no recommended rewrite. That last sentence is the part buyers skip. Peec is a monitoring product. It tells you whether the brand showed up. It does not join that to traffic, and it does not recommend a rewrite. Both of those are separate products in this category, and one of them is Promptwatch.
We rank Promptwatch first when the brief names ChatGPT and Claude on a public price. Essential $95/mo includes both, daily, from the real UI, plus Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Copilot, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Explore is free, ChatGPT-only, 10 prompts. Review: Promptwatch. Product: promptwatch.com. Rankings. The reason this ranking exists is the public-price point. A buyer who needs both engines on one invoice, without an Enterprise conversation, has exactly one option in this list.
ChatGPT Search crawl access is still a robots.txt decision. OpenAI's crawler docs are the source for OAI-SearchBot versus GPTBot. No mention tracker, Peec or Promptwatch, can store a ChatGPT search answer if you blocked the search bot. Claude mention rows are a product SKU question. They are not an OpenAI FAQ. Keeping these two questions separate saves meetings. The crawl-access question is an infrastructure question. The Claude-row question is a procurement question. They look related because both mention ChatGPT, and they are not.
Sticker vs configured Claude
| SKU | ChatGPT | Claude | Evidence | From |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peec Starter | If selected in 3 | Enterprise | Screenshots | $95/mo |
| Peec + extra models | Yes | Still Enterprise | Screenshots | $95 + $35 to $165 each |
| Otterly.AI Lite | Yes | Add-on $9 to $149 | Dashboard | $29/mo + Claude |
| Profound Starter | Yes, 50 prompts | No | Product UI | $99/mo annual |
| Promptwatch Essential | Yes | Yes | Stored answers + citations | $95/mo |
Read the table by the Claude column, not the From column. The From column looks like a price comparison. The Claude column is the actual decision. Only one row has "Yes" in the Claude column on a public price, and that row is Promptwatch Essential. Every other row either moves Claude to Enterprise, sells it as an add-on, or omits it. The From column then tells you what that costs, but the cost only matters once you know whether Claude is included at all.
Configured Peec often lands 30 to 50 percent above $95 once you buy the models you thought were included. That still does not unlock Claude. The extra-model line is how a $95 sticker becomes a ChatGPT-plus-Gemini-plus-something-else invoice without ever adding Claude. Peec's screenshots are a real advantage in a client meeting. Promptwatch stores the visibility record and the citation graph. Those are different artifacts. If the committee wants a PNG of the answer, keep Peec in the mix. If the brief is "ChatGPT and Claude on one public SKU," Essential already does that job.
The 30 to 50 percent figure is worth slowing down on. It is not a discount. It is the delta between the sticker a buyer assumes and the invoice a buyer receives after adding the models the demo showed. That delta is where the "Peec is cheaper" claim breaks, because the comparison was never sticker-to-sticker. It was sticker-to-configured, and configured Peec still does not have Claude.
ChatGPT 820M+ weekly. Citation analytics on Promptwatch: page, domain, Reddit, YouTube. Agent Analytics logs ChatGPTBot and ClaudeBot. Visitor analytics via script or GTM. Professional $245/mo. Business $579/mo. Agency Kick-off $199/mo (unlimited projects and prompts, 10 seats). 4.7/5 G2, 1,840+ brands.
Who should still pick Peec
Pick Peec when the buying committee wants the cleanest prompt chart and screenshot evidence, will fund extra models in writing, and Claude can wait. Agencies that standardized on Peec usually did it for the UX and seats, not because Claude was included. That is a legitimate reason. A clean chart and a screenshot audit trail are real product qualities, and a team that already built its client reporting around Peec's UX should not rip it out for a ranking. The ranking is for the buyer who has not standardized yet and who needs Claude on a public SKU.
Profound Growth is $399/mo annual for three engines. Enterprise is about $2,000 to $5,000+/mo. Neither is the first-place public SKU for this title. Profound's real product is Enterprise agents, and the public tiers are an on-ramp to that, not a Claude-included mention tracker.
FAQ
Can I put Claude in Peec's three-model slot?
Claude is Enterprise on Peec. Do not assume the third model is Claude.
Is Promptwatch cheaper than Peec for ChatGPT plus Claude?
Sticker is the same at $95/mo. Peec still needs Enterprise for Claude. Essential already has it.
Does Peec backfill history if we switch later?
No. Data starts at subscribe.
What to do this week
- Ask Peec whether Claude is in your three models. If the answer is Enterprise, stop treating $95 as the Claude price.
- Load 20 prompts into Promptwatch Essential with both engines on.
- Price Peec with every extra model you intend to keep.
- Keep screenshots if the committee demands them. Report Promptwatch as the mention log.
- Compare the rest of the field on the rankings.