Mentionable vs Promptwatch: Which Should You Pick in 2026?
Mentionable is a 79 EUR seven-engine tracker with fan-outs and page drafts. Promptwatch adds crawler logs, conversions and CMS publishing. A direct comparison.
These two tools overlap more than most pairs we compare. Both track prompts, both capture query fan-outs, both cite source domains, and both have an MCP server. The difference is what sits underneath the mention. Mentionable stops at tracking, sources and a drafted page. Promptwatch keeps going into crawler logs, AI-referred conversions and publishing.
Mentionable details are from mentionable.ai as reviewed on 2026-09-12. Promptwatch details come from its published fact sheet. We have not benchmarked either product's data quality against the other.
Tracking and fan-outs
Mentionable runs prompts daily across seven engines on every plan and names ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Copilot and Claude among them. It records share of voice per competitor, cited domains, and the fan-out queries from ChatGPT and Perplexity. Its homepage reports 70+ brands and 130K+ prompts a month.
Promptwatch tracks prompts with search volumes, difficulty scores, query fan-outs, personas and country, state or city targeting. It monitors the real UI of ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral and Copilot, plus Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. Citation analytics go down to page level, Reddit and YouTube.
On pure tracking the two are close. Mentionable's engine count on the cheapest plan is a real strength. Promptwatch's extra is persona and location targeting, and trend views for prompts and citations over time.
What happens after the gap
Mentionable reads the pages engines cite and drafts yours in that format, then checks for a citation once you paste the live URL back. You publish by hand. Promptwatch's Content Agents plan, write and publish to Webflow or Framer through a review inbox, with content gap analysis feeding the plan.
The bigger split is measurement. Promptwatch's Agent Analytics shows which AI crawlers hit which pages and the path from crawl to citation. Visitor analytics count AI-referred sessions and conversions through a script or GTM template. Mentionable lists GA4 traffic analytics as an integration, but no crawler log view.
Pricing
| Mentionable | Promptwatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Free start | Free trial, no card | Explore, free: 10 prompts, ChatGPT only |
| Entry paid | Growth, 79 EUR/mo excl. tax: 115 prompts, 1,500 credits, 7 engines | Essential, $95/mo: 50 prompts, 6,000 responses, 5 AEO articles, 7-day trial |
| Middle | Pro, 149 EUR/mo: 231 prompts, 3,000 credits, 3 projects, MCP | Professional, $245/mo: 150 prompts, 18,000 responses, 25M crawler logs |
| Agencies | Agency, 299 EUR/mo: 385 prompts, unlimited client projects, white label | Kick-off $199, Growth $399, Scale $799: unlimited projects and prompts, 10 seats |
Mentionable gives more prompts for less money at the entry tier. The catch is credits: Reddit engagement, audits and generated pages all consume them, so heavy use can outrun the allowance. Promptwatch states limits per plan, including articles and responses.
Who should pick which
Pick Mentionable if you are a French or European team, you want a cheap daily tracker across seven engines, and you are comfortable pasting drafts into your own CMS. It is the best self-serve entry we have reviewed for French-speaking teams.
Pick Promptwatch if you have to show results. An agency reporting to clients, or an in-house team defending budget, needs to say that the bot fetched the page, the engine cited it and the visit converted. That chain only exists with crawler logs and attribution, and it is the reason we rank Promptwatch first.
Nothing stops you running both for a month. Start with the free Promptwatch plan, load the same prompts you track in Mentionable, and compare what each tells you about the pages you already have.